Bug 529659 - Option -print-multi-os-directory is not described in man page gcc(1)
Summary: Option -print-multi-os-directory is not described in man page gcc(1)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gcc
Version: 5.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-10-19 11:32 UTC by Michal Nowak
Modified: 2013-03-08 02:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: gcc-4.1.2-49.el5
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-13 23:57:54 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2011:0025 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: gcc security and bug fix update 2011-01-13 10:47:58 UTC

Description Michal Nowak 2009-10-19 11:32:00 UTC
Description of problem:

gcc --help reports about option -print-multi-os-directory

.qa.[root@x86-64-5s-m1 tps]# gcc --help | grep 'print-multi-os-directory'
  -print-multi-os-directory Display the relative path to OS libraries

and it works:

.qa.[root@x86-64-5s-m1 tps]# gcc -print-multi-os-directory
../lib64

But is not described in man page gcc(1). The only similar options in the man pages are: `-print-multi-directory' and `-print-multi-lib'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

gcc-4.1.2-46.el5.x86_64

How reproducible:

always

Expected results:

Option `-print-multi-os-directory' described in man page gcc(1).

Additional info:

`-print-multi-os-directory' seems to be missing at Rawhide too.

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2009-10-21 17:18:42 UTC
Fixed upstream, will backport to 4.4-RH.

Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2009-11-11 10:11:49 UTC
Why have you reassigned this to gcc44?  In RHEL5 gcc man page and info pages are provided just by gcc, not gcc44, so even when it is fixed in 4.4-RH (it is), it doesn't make a difference for RHEL5.

Comment 3 Michal Nowak 2009-11-11 10:27:23 UTC
I was asked by Ondrej Hudlicky to change it from gcc to gcc44 as he have thought there won't be interest in fixing it RHEL5 gcc. If you wish I can move it back to gcc and also clone this for gcc44.

Comment 4 Jakub Jelinek 2009-11-11 10:53:10 UTC
As I said, no need to clone for gcc44, as there is nothing to fix for gcc44 in RHEL5 (and, gcc in RHEL6 has it already fixed).

Comment 5 Jakub Jelinek 2010-09-27 06:33:28 UTC
In gcc-4.1.2-49.el5

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 23:57:54 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0025.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.