Bug 529851 - audit package upgrade for RHEL5.5
audit package upgrade for RHEL5.5
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: audit (Show other bugs)
5.4
All Linux
high Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Steve Grubb
BaseOS QE Security Team
: Rebase
Depends On:
Blocks: 5.5TechNotes-Updates
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-10-20 09:14 EDT by Steve Grubb
Modified: 2010-11-22 18:27 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 04:20:03 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Steve Grubb 2009-10-20 09:14:08 EDT
Description of problem:
The audit package should be rebased in the 5.5 release cycle to the 1.7.16 release. The current change log is here:

https://fedorahosted.org/audit/browser/tags/audit-1.7.16/1.8/ChangeLog

Since 1.7.13 (RHEL5.4) some of the highlights are:

* Allow ausearch/report to specify multiple node names (needed for remote logging)
* Make auparse handle empty AUSOURCE_FILE_ARRAY correctly (was segfaulting)
* In auditctl rules allow a0-a3 to be negative numbers
* Add audit.rules man page
* In auditd reset syslog warnings if disk space becomes available
* Correct checking of != operator in audit_rule_fieldpair_data
* and many remote logging code improvements

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
audit-1.7.16
Comment 4 Steve Grubb 2009-12-08 16:12:00 EST
audit-1.7.17-1 was built to resolve this issue.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-30 04:20:03 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0228.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.