Bug 537213 - [abrt] crash detected in gvfs-1.4.1-3.fc12
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in gvfs-1.4.1-3.fc12
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 500655
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gvfs
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:7e464f1eb0ddb0c39a5a00afc95...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-11-12 20:11 UTC by Michael Monreal
Modified: 2015-03-03 22:41 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-11-13 09:30:30 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (10.77 KB, text/plain)
2009-11-12 20:11 UTC, Michael Monreal 		no flags Details
View All

Description Michael Monreal 2009-11-12 20:11:04 UTC 
abrt detected a crash.

How to reproduce
-----
1. try to connect to a gnome-user-share'd share a number of times
2. about every 3rd time, gvfs will crash like this

Comment
-----
The gnome-user-share "server" I want to access is running on Fedora 11 in case it matters.

Is there a way to improve the backtrace? I have installed about every debuginfo package I could think of...

Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-dav --spawner :1.7 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/14
component: gvfs
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-dav
kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
package: gvfs-1.4.1-3.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process was terminated by signal 11
Comment 1 Michael Monreal 2009-11-12 20:11:08 UTC 
Created attachment 369309 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2009-11-13 01:28:09 UTC 
Looks like the segfault is actually in avahi_service_resolver_event
Comment 3 Michael Monreal 2009-11-13 07:34:57 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Looks like the segfault is actually in avahi_service_resolver_event  

Right... offtopic: I have noticed ABRT guessing wrong bug modules a number of times now, is there a way to improve that? Manually changing the module is not supported either...
Comment 4 Tomáš Bžatek 2009-11-13 09:30:30 UTC 
No, it's a gvfs bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 500655 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.