Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
xdvik-22.84.14-7.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
Setting to ASSIGNED per Fedora Bug Triage workflow. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
Created attachment 371723 [details] root.log root.log for i386
Created attachment 371724 [details] build.log build.log for i386
Created attachment 371725 [details] mock.log mock.log for i386
Created attachment 371726 [details] root.log root.log for x86_64
Created attachment 371727 [details] build.log build.log for x86_64
Created attachment 371728 [details] mock.log mock.log for x86_64
Jindrich - not sure what's changed here with the texlive packages, it seems to be failing as there's no texmf tree at at /usr/share/texmf - has something changed? I didn't think you dropped tl2009 into rawhide, yet but perhaps you did?
OK, adding a BuildRequires for tex(tex) seems to have fixed this. Fixed build pushed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1948732
(In reply to comment #8) > Jindrich - not sure what's changed here with the texlive packages, it seems to > be failing as there's no texmf tree at at /usr/share/texmf - has something > changed? I didn't think you dropped tl2009 into rawhide, yet but perhaps you > did? Hi Jonathan, I'm not quite sure what broke as it seems that %{_texmf_main} doesn't simply get defined anywhere. In any case usage of virtual provides such as tex(tex) or tex(latex) is the best way how to ensure it is defined. Some old package even use the old styled tetex-* deps which are not guaranteed to work any more.