Spec URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: RasMol is an X Window System tool intended for the visualization of proteins and nucleic acids. It reads Brookhaven Protein Database (PDB) files and interactively renders them in a variety of formats on either an 8-bit or 24/32-bit color display.
koji scratch build now works. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-5.fc12.src.rpm
Just a really quick comment after skimming over the spec: %{__cp} -a data %buildroot%{_datadir}/%{name} %{__mv} %buildroot%{_libdir}/%{name}/* %buildroot%{_datadir}/%{name} %{__install} -D -m 644 src/%{name}.png %buildroot%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/%{name}.png Please use %{buildroot} consistently... Stefan
Fixed. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-6.fc12.src.rpm
scratch build koji reference: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1838391
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-7.fc12.src.rpm changes from ghemical review: - create desktop file in %%prep - remove __ macros http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839653
I don't find the relevant section in the guidelines, but I *believe* to remember, that you are not allowed to package 5 packages into this one. Don't you *have* to package cqrlib, cvector, neartree and cbflib first and at the end rasmol on its own?? As already said, I could be wrong here, but don't think so...
I have RPMs for packages of cqrlib, cvector, neartree and cbflib and they available at http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/install-memo/fedora/repoview/ I can fit them to fedora. After fitting my RPMs to Fedora, I'll create Fedora account and create review process shortly.
Please ignore the account for comment #7. It's for crash reporter account. Anyway, I'll make RPMs for Fedora.
Package review of cbflib, cqrlib, cvector, and neartree are filed in bug 545044, bug 545045, bug 545046, and bug 545047 respectively.
For CBFlib, see bug 523877. Sorry. I forgot to check it. I suggest this bug is depended on bug 523877, bug 545045, bug 545046, and bug 545047.
(In reply to comment #10) > For CBFlib, see bug 523877. > Sorry. I forgot to check it. > > I suggest this bug is depended on bug 523877, bug 545045, bug 545046, and bug > 545047. If nobody want to continue the work on including rasmol and other packages from list above into Fedora repo I could try to do it (need sponsor but could).
(In reply to comment #11) > If nobody want to continue the work on including rasmol and other packages from > list above into Fedora repo I could try to do it (need sponsor but could). For dependent packages which are assigned to me, I'm now in training to get sponsor. See bug 545046.
Ah, grate! Waiting rasmol in Fedora repo.
(In reply to comment #6) > I don't find the relevant section in the guidelines, but I *believe* to > remember, that you are not allowed to package 5 packages into this one. > > Don't you *have* to package cqrlib, cvector, neartree and cbflib first and at > the end rasmol on its own?? > > As already said, I could be wrong here, but don't think so... Yes, this is explicitly banned in the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
Where is the latest Spec and SRPM files?
(In reply to comment #15) > Where is the latest Spec and SRPM files? CBFlib isn't available in Fedora yet.
I'd like to add GTK2 support for el6 and Fedora 13-15 based on Carl's SRPM because it is reviewed here. However I cannot get spec and SRPM files from www.five-ten-sg.com website. If Carl doesn't have enough time, I can work.
I don't have time to package the four dependencies cqrlib, cvector, neartree and cbflib. I think the cleanest way is to autoconf them, which I did for cqrlib. That same method should work for the other three. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/cqrlib.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/CQRlib-1.0.6.tar.gz http://www.five-ten-sg.com/autoconf-files.tar.gz http://www.five-ten-sg.com/CQRlib-1.0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec Once those four are accepted into Fedora, there is not much more to do to get rasmol itself accepted.
Ping?
I'll catch up.
No response in some time; I'm going to go ahead and close this. If someone besides Carl wishes to submit this package, please open your own review ticket. Thanks.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 915144 ***