SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-DBD-SQLite-1.27-2.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-DBD-SQLite.spec
I wonder how can this package got missed at time of FC-6 when all core packages submitted for their merge-reviews.
Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863813 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 86cf772505009252d9e1239d8caab37ffc353c05 DBD-SQLite-1.27.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=54, Tests=831, 12 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.05 sys + 3.15 cusr 0.36 csys = 3.77 CPU) + Package perl-DBD-SQLite-1.27-2.fc13.i686 => Provides: perl(DBD::SQLite) = 1.27 perl(DBD::SQLite::db) perl(DBD::SQLite::dr) perl(DBD::SQLite::_WriteOnceHash) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(DBI) >= 1.57 perl(DynaLoader) perl(locale) perl(strict) perl(Tie::Hash) perl(vars) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application APPROVED.
Thank you for your review.