Bug 543558 - removal of busybox-anaconda breaks system-config-netboot
Summary: removal of busybox-anaconda breaks system-config-netboot
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: system-config-netboot
Version: 12
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Reznik
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-12-02 16:23 UTC by Chris Schanzle
Modified: 2010-12-04 02:21 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-04 02:21:57 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Schanzle 2009-12-02 16:23:33 UTC
Description of problem:

busybox-anaconda was killed - see  bugid #514319

system-config-netboot now complains:

Required binary /sbin/busybox.anaconda is not found in the client root /tmp/ion/root.
Install required packages in the client root and retry.

Obviously, this is not possible in fedora 12:

yum provides /sbin/busybox.anaconda
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, refresh-packagekit
No Matches found


Fedora 10 responds to above 'provides' with package:
busybox-anaconda-1.10.3-3.fc10.x86_64


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-netboot-0.1.45.4-7.fc12.noarch

How reproducible:
100%

Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2010-07-26 08:36:41 UTC
System-config-netboot is obsolete - I'm not sure it's worth to maintain it anymore - we have Cobbler as installation server and it's easier (and much more cleaner) to achieve diskless network boot with Dracut (but no UI is in place). What's your opinion (so I can eol this package/application)?

Comment 2 Johnny Stenback 2010-07-26 15:03:28 UTC
I don't know if it's gotten any maintenance attention since Fedora 12, if not, it seems completely broken (in more ways than what's described here it seems), so if there's another way an no energy being used towards a better system-config-netboot then it probably hurts more than it helps IMO. So FWIW I'd be in favor of eol'ing it.

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2010-11-04 04:35:35 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 12.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '12'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2010-12-04 02:21:57 UTC
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.