Bug 54704 - Jumping text in Balsa "To:" field
Jumping text in Balsa "To:" field
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: balsa (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Bill Nottingham
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2001-10-16 14:50 EDT by Michal Jaegermann
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:23 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2001-10-22 02:06:35 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Michal Jaegermann 2001-10-16 14:50:35 EDT
Description of Problem:

In "Compose" of Balsa when writing recipient in "To:" field of a new
message a typed text jumps right and left apparently depending on
a number of characters typed.  This may depend on a choice of fonts
but it happens at least with
but not, for example, with
-b&h-lucidux mono-medium-r-normal-*-16-*-*-*-m-*-iso8859-15

If one will type spurious characters to force a text to jump
left then these extras can be erased and the text will stay left.
I did not observe anything like that in other entry fields
(but, come to think of it, I did not try 'Cc:').

The same effect was also observed on another system where some
other fonts were used (some courier, I think).

BTW - a choice of a default font is pretty terrible (unreadable
on most displays) and it is not really obvious how to change these.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2001-10-22 02:06:30 EDT
I can't reproduce the font jumping in balsa-1.2.1-1, which will be in rawhide
soon. It also has a somewhat better default font (of course, that's always in
the eye of the beholder. :) )
Comment 2 Michal Jaegermann 2001-10-22 14:43:41 EDT
Yes, indeed. An absence of wildly jumping strings seems to be a difference
between balsa-1.1.7-5, as included in Enigma-RC2, and balsa-1.2.1-1.

As for defaults fonts they seem to be now indeed only "tiny" instead
of "unreadable". :-)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.