From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2.1) Gecko/20010901 Description of problem: Can't choose those family name because it is included the black lists. However the fonts which has it exists mostly. those fonts is also useful. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install ttfonts-ja-1.0-7 2.Restart xfs 3.See Preferences of Nautilus Actual Results: Doesn't see those family name on font lists. Expected Results: Can see those family name. Additional info:
Created attachment 34341 [details] I have a patch.
Obvious question: why are the fonts in the blacklist? Surely someone had a reason for that.
AFAIK those entries has existed in the black lists since it was made. I'm not sure it seems that they thought they aren't useful. However it has motion which corrects it because the fonts using XLFD which is not much desirable existed mostly. so I think that list should be fixed.
fixing in eel-1.0.2-2.
fixed in an upcoming errata.
From Darin: Ramiro added the blacklist because of bugs that happened with bad fonts. I don't know what was bad about the fonts, but I remember that the bugs included both crashing problems and incorrect display of various types. I've never thought that recognizing these "bad fonts" by name was a good idea. But I also have no idea what might go wrong if we don't filter them out. I forgot to ask him about this earlier, sorry... given the vagueness we should probably just try removing the fonts from the blacklist and see if it breaks.
eel-devel-1.0.2-2 should be pushed out too, otherwise someone who installed both eel and eel-devel won't be able to update eel, because eel-devel-1.0.1 requires eel = 1.0.1.
eel-devel is now included.
11/8/2001 - Have not seen eel-devel-1.0.2-2 shipped out yet. Made by rebuilding srpms file.