Bug 549460 - [Emulex 5.5 bug] Multiple bug fixes for be2net
Summary: [Emulex 5.5 bug] Multiple bug fixes for be2net
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 5.5
Assignee: Ivan Vecera
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 460949 533941 560968
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-12-21 18:30 UTC by Subbu Seetharaman
Modified: 2013-01-11 02:39 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 07:16:34 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Fixes for bugs found in QA since last update (17.00 KB, patch)
2009-12-21 18:30 UTC, Subbu Seetharaman
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0178 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.5 kernel security and bug fix update 2010-03-29 12:18:21 UTC

Description Subbu Seetharaman 2009-12-21 18:30:58 UTC
Created attachment 379669 [details]
Fixes for  bugs found in QA since last update

Include patch to fix multiple bug fixes in be2net that were found by SE/Emulex QA.

Subbu

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2010-01-05 09:12:45 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 4 Chris Ward 2010-01-05 14:34:09 UTC
@Emulex, @ServerEngines

We need to confirm that there is commitment to test for 
the resolution of this request during the RHEL 5.5 Beta 
Test Phase before we can approve it for acceptance 
into the release.

RHEL 5.5 Beta Test Phase is expected to begin around February
2010.

In order to avoid any unnecessary delays, please post a 
confirmation as soon as possible, including the contact 
information for testing engineers.

Any additional information about alternative testing variations we 
could use to reproduce this issue in-house would be appreciated.

Comment 7 Ivan Vecera 2010-01-06 13:02:12 UTC
Comment on attachment 379669 [details]
Fixes for  bugs found in QA since last update

1. Some parts (SEEPROM, EEPROM) are not upstream yet, when will they be?
2. Support for OC_DEVICE_ID2 (0x701) was removed. Why?

Ivan

Comment 8 Subbu Seetharaman 2010-01-06 16:54:18 UTC
Vasavi (vasavib) is the QA resource from ServerEngines.

Patch for dumping SEEPROM was submitted to netdev today

0x701 is a stale ID not used by Emulex and hence it was removed.

Subbu

Comment 12 Chris Ward 2010-02-11 10:24:26 UTC
~~ Attention Customers and Partners - RHEL 5.5 Beta is now available on RHN ~~

RHEL 5.5 Beta has been released! There should be a fix present in this 
release that addresses your request. Please test and report back results 
here, by March 3rd 2010 (2010-03-03) or sooner.

Upon successful verification of this request, post your results and update 
the Verified field in Bugzilla with the appropriate value.

If you encounter any issues while testing, please describe them and set 
this bug into NEED_INFO. If you encounter new defects or have additional 
patch(es) to request for inclusion, please clone this bug per each request
and escalate through your support representative.

Comment 14 Vasavi 2010-03-08 15:07:56 UTC
All the fixes have been tested and verified.
Extensive tests are running.
Kernel version used: 191.el5
Driver: 2.102.115r

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-30 07:16:34 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0178.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.