Spec URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/libopenr2/libopenr2.spec SRPM URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/libopenr2/libopenr2-1.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: OpenR2 is a library that implements the MFC/R2 signalling over E1 lines using the Zapata Telephony interface. The MF R2 tones required for the signalling are generated by code borrowed from the LGPL library SpanDSP written by Steve Underwood, the user has the option to provide a MF interface to use his own MF R2 tone generation and detection so the library will use them when needed, that's why this library does not depend directly on spandsp, libteletone or zaptel for tone generation and detection (depends on zaptel for ABCD bits and general media transmission though) E1 with r2 signalling is used in brazil and mexico. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1885261
> %files > %doc %dir doc/asterisk Directories are never marked %doc. > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/openr2/r2proto.conf > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/openr2/r2test.conf Which package owns %{_sysconfdir}/openr2/? > %files devel > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LESSER NEWS README TODO Is it really necessary to duplicate all these %doc files in this package? The -devel package already depends on the base package anyway. > %{_includedir}/openr2.h > %{_includedir}/openr2/*.h Directory %{_includedir}/openr2/ is not included. > License: LGPLv2 > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LESSER NEWS README TODO Interestingly, files COPYING and COPYING.LESSER contain the GPL v3 and the LGPL v3, respectively. And many of the source files contain either a LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+ header, so the licensing is not clear yet.
Were the licensing issues ever clarified? How about some response to the above commentary?