This package is being requested as a part of the brlcad package. It is being abstracted to clean out external libraries. Spec URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A set of C++ headers implementing the Java Matrix Library. Contains templates for classical matrix algebra and for a series of matrix decompositions such as LU, QR, SVD, Cholesky methods.
updated spec and SRPM to BuildArch: noarch since package consists of only header files. Spec URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel-1.2.5-2.fc12.src.rpm
Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR since I just sponsored Matt.
I'll review it.
Updated package name to jama from jama-devel and included the use of a subpackage from feedback on the tnt package. Also cleaned up the %install section. SPEC: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama.spec SRPM: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-1.2.5-2.fc12.src.rpm Matt
REVIEW: + rpmlint is not silent, but his the only warning may be omitted. [petro@Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/jama-devel-1.2.5-2.fc12.noarch.rpm jama-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro@Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. 0 Upstream doesn't provide the file file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum jama125.zip* 7432bf51d7101f63d5880421f940f64cea124f1460ff2fcfb6226e6744d1360c jama125.zip 7432bf51d7101f63d5880421f940f64cea124f1460ff2fcfb6226e6744d1360c jama125.zip.1 [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. 0 The package doesn't contain %doc files. + C header files packaged in devel sub-package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED.
Ping, Matt!
Ping, again.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jama Short Description: A collection of C++ matrix templates Owners: talcite Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5 InitialCC:
CVS Done Does this need a EL-6 branch also?
Ah! The wiki page didn't mention that EL-6 was an option. Yes, please create one. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jama New Branches: EL-6 Owners: talcite
CVS Done
Ping, Matt.
Last ping. I'll close this ticket next week if there will be no answer.
ping again.