Bug 5517 - samba-common missing files after upgrade
samba-common missing files after upgrade
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm (Show other bugs)
6.1
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeff Johnson
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-10-04 17:49 EDT by Ian Macdonald
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-10-29 14:36:39 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ian Macdonald 1999-10-04 17:49:52 EDT
After upgrading from RHL 6.0 to 6.1, samba no longer worked.
Here's why:

[root@caliban ~]# rpm -V samba-common
missing    /etc/codepages
missing    /etc/codepages/src
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.437
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.737
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.850
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.852
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.861
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.866
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.932
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.936
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.949
missing    /etc/codepages/src/codepage_def.950
missing    /etc/smb.conf
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-04 17:52:59 EDT
Exactly which version of samba did you have previously?
Comment 2 Ian Macdonald 1999-10-04 17:55:59 EDT
I was using samba-2.0.5a-1.i386.rpm, which was an official update to
the stock RPM included with RHL 6.0.
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-04 18:01:59 EDT
Did you modify the config file at all?
Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-04 18:16:59 EDT
Do you have an /etc/smb.conf.rpmsave?
Comment 5 Ian Macdonald 1999-10-04 18:27:59 EDT
Yes, I had modified the /etc/smb.conf and yes, it had been saved as
/etc/smb.conf.rpmsave
Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 1999-10-05 11:21:59 EDT
OK. It's some RPM weirdness; we're looking into it.
I can't reproduce the codepages being missing; they still
should be created by the %post script.
Comment 7 Jeff Johnson 2001-01-09 10:21:26 EST
This was a problem with transaction sets before (IIRC) rpm-3.0.2, long since
fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.