Please be so kind as to post the spec URL.

SPEC : http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-java.spec

I've roughly scanned over the package and I've seen a couple of issues. It
would be good if they could be fixed first before I do the full complete
review:

- source files differ from upstream and the source URL does not match the link
on the download page:
http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/sources/monodevelop-java/monodevelop-java-2.2.tar.bz2

- License: it looks like that the source files and the COPYING file points to GPLv2+ instead of MIT - please can you check this?

- package does not build (x86_64):
Looking for required packages
Checking for package 'mono-addins'.. found.
Checking for package 'gtk-sharp-2.0'.. ERROR: Package named 'gtk-sharp-2.0' >= 2.12.8 not found.
Try adjusting your PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.d20ndr (%build)
RPM build errors:

- directory %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/JavaBinding must be packaged

SRPM URL:
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-java-2.2-2.fc13.src.rpm
SPEC : http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-java.spec

Fixes above issues

SRPM URL:
http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-java-2.2-3.fc13.src.rpm
SPEC : http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-java.spec

Fixes the above and gettext issues

I've looked at the new package and I've observed the following issues:

1. This packages suffers from the same problem with the moved locales as monodevelop-boo: The translations are not found anymore at all.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551911#c5

2. There are a couple of minor rpmlint warnings (typos, tabs vs. spaces, ...) (no-binary, no-documentation, configure-... etc. are false positives, they don't need to be fixed)

Please can you fix both of the problems before I do the full official review? Thanks!

I repackage monodevelop-java to update upstream version 2.4

Spec URL: http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/monodevelop-java.spec
SRPM URL:
http://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/monodevelop-java-2.4-1.fc13.src.rpm

Please review

FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Thanks!

#7 : Is this based on my srpm?

(In reply to comment #8)
> #7 : Is this based on my srpm?    

Yes!, is based on your srpm.

Paul, are you still interested getting this package reviewed? 

Claudio, if you want to take over this review, I think the best way would be if you create a new Review Request.

Ping? Any progress here? Or we can close this review?

Monodevelop from 3.0 and newer not provide a source for this plugin. I suggest to close ticket.

closing per #12