Bug 552226 - [abrt] crash detected in ristretto-0.0.22-2.fc12
Summary: [abrt] crash detected in ristretto-0.0.22-2.fc12
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 542141
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ristretto
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christoph Wickert
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:c22e9e5fc8e031681c97ee0b1e9...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-04 12:26 UTC by Rasmus Dall
Modified: 2010-01-04 12:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-04 12:37:33 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (5.08 KB, text/plain)
2010-01-04 12:26 UTC, Rasmus Dall
no flags Details

Description Rasmus Dall 2010-01-04 12:26:45 UTC
abrt 1.0.0 detected a crash.

How to reproduce
-----
1. Open Ristretto by double clicking an image
2. Full screen
3. View images

Comment: I did not notice that anything happened with Ristretto, to me it seemed to work perfectly. But since the ABRT detected a crash I decided to report it.
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: ristretto /home/Rasmus/Pictures/Gordons/voergaard/voergaard_2/DSC_0041.JPG
component: ristretto
executable: /usr/bin/ristretto
kernel: 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686
package: ristretto-0.0.22-2.fc12
rating: 3
reason: Process was terminated by signal 11

Comment 1 Rasmus Dall 2010-01-04 12:26:48 UTC
Created attachment 381531 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Christoph Wickert 2010-01-04 12:37:33 UTC
Hi Rasmus,

thanks for your report. Unfortunately the backtrace is incomplete because ABRT, the automatic bug reporting tool fails to install the necessary debuginfo packages. When ristretto crashes again, please run

$ debuginfo-install ristretto

before letting abrt generate the bug report. Hopefully abrt-1.0.2 will fix this, so that you don't need to install the debuginfo manually.

From what I can see and from your description your crash looks similar to bug 542141, which has a better backtrace.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 542141 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.