Bug 552674 - gdb/mi: exec-next should not require ^running
Summary: gdb/mi: exec-next should not require ^running
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eclipse-cdt
Version: 19
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeff Johnston
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-05 20:30 UTC by Jan Kratochvil
Modified: 2015-02-17 13:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-17 13:15:53 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
GDB workaround of the Eclipse bug. (495 bytes, patch)
2010-01-05 20:30 UTC, Jan Kratochvil
no flags Details | Diff
Eclipse screenshots + GDB MI input/output. (212.02 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-01-05 20:33 UTC, Jan Kratochvil
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Eclipse Project 303004 0 None None None Never

Description Jan Kratochvil 2010-01-05 20:30:39 UTC
Created attachment 381831 [details]
GDB workaround of the Eclipse bug.

Description of problem:
FSF gdb-7.0+ supports stepping into inlined functions.  Which is no CPU step at all, only more frames get reported without any change of real PC.
In this case "-exec-step 1" generates immediate async "*stopped" record together with "^done" record.
Eclipse ignores such operation unless it sees "^running" as a result.
While it can be workarounded in GDB I believe Eclipse should be fixed instead.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
eclipse-cdt-6.0.0-10.fc12.x86_64
eclipse-emf-2.5.0-4.fc12.noarch
eclipse-platform-3.5.1-21.fc12.x86_64
eclipse-rcp-3.5.1-21.fc12.x86_64
eclipse-rse-3.1-2.fc12.noarch
eclipse-swt-3.5.1-21.fc12.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
source:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
static __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) void
func (void)
{
  volatile int i = 1;

  i = i;
}

int
main (void)
{
  volatile int j = 2;

  func ();

  return 0;
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debug as -> Local C/C++ Application.
It stops at "volatile int j = 2;" - screenshot 0.
F5 - Step Into
It stops at "func ();" - screenshot 1.
F5 - Step Into
Actual results:   It stays stopped at "func();" - screenshot 2bad.
Expected results: It stops at "volatile int i = 1;" - screenshot 2good.
F5 - Step Into
It stops at "i = 1;" - screenshot 3.

Additional info:

bad case - the current unpatched behavior:

1414-exec-step 1
->
(gdb)
*stopped,frame={addr="0x0000000000400492",func="func",args=[],file="../inlineskip.c",fullname="/home/jkratoch/workspace/inlineskip/inlineskip.c",line="4"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all"
1414^done
(gdb)

good case - with workaround in GDB:

1478-exec-step 1
->
(gdb)
1478^running
*running,thread-id="1"
(gdb)
*stopped,frame={addr="0x0000000000400492",func="func",args=[],file="../inlineskip.c",fullname="/home/jkratoch/workspace/inlineskip/inlineskip.c",line="4"},thread-id="1",stopped-threads="all"
(gdb)

This problem is targeted at -O2 -g debugging and there are more cases to be introduced in GDB with this behavior (of no real PC change).  Currently it happens also for stepping-out of inlined functions and it will happen even for first step after stepping-out of normal functions.

Comment 1 Jan Kratochvil 2010-01-05 20:33:27 UTC
Created attachment 381832 [details]
Eclipse screenshots + GDB MI input/output.

Comment 2 Jan Kratochvil 2010-02-13 11:53:32 UTC
MI doc update suggests how to fix Eclipse:

http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-02/msg00319.html

@item "^running"
@findex ^running
This result record is equivalent to @samp{^done}.  Historically, it
was output instead of @samp{^done} if the command has resumed the
target.  This behaviour is maintained for backward compatibility, but
all frontends should treat @samp{^done} and @samp{^running}
identically and rely on the @samp{*running} output record to determine
which threads are resumed.

Comment 3 Jeff Johnston 2010-02-16 22:07:20 UTC
I have opened a bug upstream on the CDT CDI debug for this issue.  DSF gets the step into the inline function correct, but it hangs there and the step/next/etc.. buttons are disabled.

Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2010-11-04 01:47:13 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 12.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '12'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 5 Jan Kratochvil 2010-11-04 03:01:00 UTC
eclipse-cdt-6.0.2-5.fc13.x86_64
gdb-7.1-34.fc13.x86_64

Comment 6 Bug Zapper 2011-06-02 16:59:26 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 13.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '13'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 7 Jan Kratochvil 2011-06-09 02:16:58 UTC
Not reverified but I haven't heard about a fix.

Comment 8 Fedora End Of Life 2013-04-03 18:40:28 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle.
Changing version to '19'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19

Comment 9 Fedora End Of Life 2015-01-09 16:14:32 UTC
This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora 
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is 
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no 
longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will
be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 10 Fedora End Of Life 2015-02-17 13:15:53 UTC
Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.