SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-MIME-tools/5.427/4.fc13/src/perl-MIME-tools-5.427-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1712328&filename=perl-MIME-tools.spec Description: MIME-tools is a collection of Perl5 MIME:: modules for parsing, decoding, and generating single- or multipart (even nested multipart) MIME messages.
MUST items: [NO] rpmplint is silent $ rpmlint *.rpm perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeabuse perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimetour perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimesender perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeprint perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeref perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimesender perl(Mail::Send) perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeref perl(Data::Dumper) 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. [YES] Package meets naming guidelines. [YES] Package meets packaging guidelines. [YES] Spec file matches base package name. [YES] License file is present, matching with spec file. [YES] Licensing Guidelines are met. [YES] Spec file is legible and in American English. [YES] Sources match upstream. [YES] Package builds OK. [YES] BuildRequires is correct. [YES] Package doesn't bundle copies of system libraries. [YES] Package owns all the directories it creates. [YES] Package has no duplicity in %files. [YES] Permission on files are set properly. [YES] %clean section is correct. [YES] Spec file has consistant macro usage. [YES] Package is code or permissable content. [YES] %doc files don't affect runtime. [YES] No .la libtool archives. [YES][Perl] Package doesn't own files/directories that other packages own. [YES] Package has rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at beginning of %install. [YES] Spec file is valid UTF-8. Should items: [YES] Package builds in mock. [YES] Package uses sane scriptlets. [YES] Package contains man pages.
(In reply to comment #1) > MUST items: > [NO] rpmplint is silent > $ rpmlint *.rpm > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeabuse > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimetour > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimesender > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeprint > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeref > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimesender perl(Mail::Send) > perl-MIME-tools.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-MIME-tools-5.427/examples/mimeref perl(Data::Dumper) > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Note that, as commented in the spec file, the dependencies on perl(Mail::Send) and perl(Data::Dumper) are satisfied by packages that are already dependencies of perl-MIME-tools, so these are not additional dependencies. Having the example scripts executable makes them easier to try out and doesn't cause any additional problems.
OK, thank you for clarification, giving +.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-MIME-tools New Branches: el6 Owners: pghmcfc This package is available in EL-6 Workstation Beta 2 Optional packages but not for EL-6 Server, making it unavailable as a build requirement in EPEL-6, causing for example perl-Email-Send to fail to build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2418088&name=root.log I plan to clone the perl-MIME-tools-5.427-4.el6 package from EL-6 Workstation Beta 2 Optional and built it in EPEL-6.
It would be best to wait and see if there is going to be a extra channel with this stuff so we don't have to duplicate work with workstation first.
In the meantime, we have broken deps in the repository, such as bugzilla (Bug #626218); this package is needed to resolve that.
Yeah, sorry about that, but we don't want to just do something here now that we cannot easily back out of. ;( Hopefully we will hear something soon... see discussion on the epel-devel list.