Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 554664 - MRG current has a very old megaraid_sas driver [NEEDINFO]
MRG current has a very old megaraid_sas driver
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise MRG
Classification: Red Hat
Component: realtime-kernel (Show other bugs)
1.2
x86_64 All
low Severity high
: 1.2.5
: ---
Assigned To: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
David Sommerseth
:
: 554681 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-01-12 05:21 EST by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2016-05-22 19:29 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-23 11:43:22 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
davids: needinfo? (bugproxy)


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0161 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: kernel-rt security and bug fix update 2010-03-23 11:42:25 EDT

  None (edit)
Description IBM Bug Proxy 2010-01-12 05:21:01 EST
=Comment: #0=================================================
John G. Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> - 
So we were trying to bring up MRG on a new box, and ran into trouble
when the megaraid sas driver wasn't seeming to find the controller.

All we got with kernel-rt-2.6.24.7-146.el5rt.x86_64.rpm was:
-----------------------------------------------------------
megasas: 00.00.03.16-rc1 Thu. Nov. 07 10:09:32 PDT 2007

<no driver messages>
...
<panic, no root device>



Where as with RHEL5.4:
----------------------
SCSI subsystem initialized
megasas: 00.00.04.08-RH2 Tues. May 5, 11:41:51 PST 2009
megasas: 0x1000:0x0079:0x1014:0x03b2: bus 9:slot 0:func 0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:09:00.0[A] -> GSI 24 (level, low) -> IRQ 177
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:09:00.0 to 64
megasas: FW now in Ready state
scsi0 : LSI SAS based MegaRAID driver
  Vendor: IBM-ESXS  Model: ST9146803SS       Rev: B536
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
  Vendor: IBM-ESXS  Model: ST9146803SS       Rev: B536
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
  Vendor: IBM       Model: ServeRAID M5015   Rev: 2.0.
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
SCSI device sda: 570310656 512-byte hdwr sectors (291999 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 1f 00 00 08
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back, no read (daft)
SCSI device sda: 570310656 512-byte hdwr sectors (291999 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 1f 00 00 08
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back, no read (daft)
 sda: sda1 sda2


I suspect the MRG driver stating that its from Nov 07 might mean its a
bit old. Talked w/ Chris McDermott and he magically knew what commit
*should* fix this:
        git show 6610a6b354d6c3377a1e79cd1d760ffe4358245c

Any chance that this commit could be added?
Comment 1 Luis Claudio R. Goncalves 2010-01-12 06:36:49 EST
*** Bug 554681 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Luis Claudio R. Goncalves 2010-01-12 07:07:54 EST
Patch bz554664-scsi-megaraid_sas-add-new-controllers-0x78-0x79.patch, backport of upstream commit 6610a6b354d6c3377a1e79cd1d760ffe4358245c, has been added to kernel 2.6.24.7-247.el5rt patch queue.
Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2010-01-18 16:20:37 EST
------- Comment From johnstul@us.ibm.com 2010-01-18 16:11 EDT-------
Rob has tested the -147 kernel with the system in question and it did boot up. I think we can mark this resolved.
Comment 4 David Sommerseth 2010-01-19 07:33:10 EST
(In reply to comment #3)
> ------- Comment From johnstul@us.ibm.com 2010-01-18 16:11 EDT-------
> Rob has tested the -147 kernel with the system in question and it did boot up.
> I think we can mark this resolved.    

This sounds indeed like wonderful news!  I don't mean to be a party killer, but have you done any stress tests with this driver?  I would just like to be sure that we don't regress on both performance and reliability.  After all it's a new controller card which now is supported, which probably means a different firmware and so on.
Comment 6 David Sommerseth 2010-03-17 15:50:46 EDT
Verified by code review.  Found patch mentioned in comment #2 applied to kernel-rt-2.6.24.7-149.src.rpm.
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-23 11:43:22 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0161.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.