Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 554809

Summary:	Uses CentOS directories in showing how to do Red Hat Enterprise Linux installation
Product:	[Retired] Fedora Documentation	Reporter:	Marc Milgram <mmilgram>
Component:	virtualization-guide	Assignee:	Fedora Documentation Project <docs>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	QA Contact:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	devel	CC:	jhradile
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-11-07 15:30:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marc Milgram 2010-01-12 17:55:34 UTC

Description of problem:
In the section titled "Installing Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 as a para-virtualized guest", it gives samples which use CentOS directories.

The guide should be consistent.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/virtualization-guide/f12/en-US/html/chap-Virtualization_Guide-Guest_operating_system_installation_procedures.html

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Look at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/virtualization-guide/f12/en-US/html/chap-Virtualization_Guide-Guest_operating_system_installation_procedures.html .
  
Actual results:
In the Red Hat Enterprise Linux section, it shows:
# virt-install -n rhel5PV -r 500 \
-f /var/lib/libvirt/images/rhel5PV.dsk -s 3 --vnc -p \
-l ftp://10.1.1.1/trees/CentOS5-B2-Server-i386/

Expected results:
# virt-install -n rhel5PV -r 500 \
-f /var/lib/libvirt/images/rhel5PV.dsk -s 3 --vnc -p \
-l ftp://10.1.1.1/trees/RHEL5-U2-Server-i386/

Or some similar output that shows RHEL instead of CentOS.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Christopher Curran 2010-01-21 23:53:13 UTC

Thanks for the bug. I'll fix this shortly.

Chris

Comment 3 Karsten Wade 2011-12-14 03:49:14 UTC

Removing myself for these bug components as I'm either no longer involved in that aspect of the project, or no longer care to watch this particular bug. Sorry if you are caught in a maelstrom of bug changes as a result!

Comment 4 Petr Bokoc 2019-11-07 15:30:16 UTC

I'm closing this bug as part of a Bugzilla cleanup effort. The most likely reason is that the bug has been opened either against a component we no longer publish, or against Release Notes for an EOL release.