Bug 555805 - [RHEL 5.5] Unnecessary error (warning) messages using libvirt tools in xen hypervisors.
Summary: [RHEL 5.5] Unnecessary error (warning) messages using libvirt tools in xen hy...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: numactl
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: beta
: ---
Assignee: Neil Horman
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 545170 561438 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-15 15:31 UTC by Gurhan Ozen
Modified: 2023-06-29 13:40 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 09:07:35 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2010:0319 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE numactl bug fix update 2010-03-29 14:43:19 UTC

Description Gurhan Ozen 2010-01-15 15:31:41 UTC
Description of problem:
Even though the error is given by libvirt tools, this is more likely a xen bug. When doing anything with libvirt tools, such as virsh, virt-install the following warning is printed:

# virsh list
libnuma: Warning: /sys not mounted or no numa system. Assuming one node: No such file or directory

While this warning message seem to be harmless, it's printed in stderror, so it breaks the scripts that might be executing those tools since the execution commands things that the tool errored out. 

This doesn't happen when using xen tools such as xm.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL5.5-Server-20091227.0 tree

How reproducible:
Everytime.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Daniel Berrangé 2010-01-15 15:42:09 UTC
This is a bug in libnuma

Comment 2 Neil Horman 2010-01-15 16:41:40 UTC
ugh, it is, and we already had a bug open for it that for whatever reason got pushed to 5.6.  Since the fix is easy, and this has a pm-ack already set on it, I'll close the other bug as a dup of this and commit from here as soon as we get the qa-ack.

Comment 3 Neil Horman 2010-01-15 16:41:59 UTC
*** Bug 545170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Neil Horman 2010-01-18 19:16:26 UTC
fixed in -11.el5.  Thanks!

Comment 5 Gurhan Ozen 2010-01-27 22:47:06 UTC
Verified with -11 , but it still isn't in rhel5.5 trees. What do we have to do to get it in the next compose?

Comment 6 Daniel Berrangé 2010-02-03 17:14:01 UTC
*** Bug 561438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2010-02-04 12:40:46 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in
the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like
this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your
support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?".

Comment 12 Chris Ward 2010-02-11 10:27:53 UTC
~~ Attention Customers and Partners - RHEL 5.5 Beta is now available on RHN ~~

RHEL 5.5 Beta has been released! There should be a fix present in this 
release that addresses your request. Please test and report back results 
here, by March 3rd 2010 (2010-03-03) or sooner.

Upon successful verification of this request, post your results and update 
the Verified field in Bugzilla with the appropriate value.

If you encounter any issues while testing, please describe them and set 
this bug into NEED_INFO. If you encounter new defects or have additional 
patch(es) to request for inclusion, please clone this bug per each request
and escalate through your support representative.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-30 09:07:35 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0319.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.