Bug 557516 - [raw-config]validation for Raw and Structured server should be consistent for the raw and structured configs
Summary: [raw-config]validation for Raw and Structured server should be consistent for...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: RHQ Project
Classification: Other
Component: Configuration
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: John Sanda
QA Contact: Preethi Thomas
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: rhq_spearhead
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-21 17:09 UTC by Preethi Thomas
Modified: 2010-09-13 20:16 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-09-13 20:16:04 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Preethi Thomas 2010-01-21 17:09:49 UTC
Description of problem:
validation for Raw and Structured server should be consistent for the raw and structured configs


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
    1. For the structured and raw server, click on on inventory-> connection
    2. Set the raw validation to yes and structured to No
    3. Go to configuration advanced mode and click on edit
    4. edit a value and commit
    5. the validation message is displayed
    6. Now click on on inventory-> connection
    7. Set the raw validation to no and structured to yes
    8. Go to configuration basic mode and click on edit
    9. edit a value and click on save
    10.see the message and see the status failure in history page. 



  
Actual results:
 Now if you set the connection property for structured is set to fail  and you try to updateyou get "Configuration update request with id 10105 has been sent to the Agent." message and Failure status with stacktrace in configuration history

But if the validation is set for the raw-config

you get the message
Configuration update was not valid configuation validation failed withValidation failed for /tmp/raw-config-test/structured-and-raw-1/structured-and-raw-test-1.txt.

Expected results:
consistent behaviour


Additional info:

Comment 1 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:59:06 UTC
Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 17:03:52 UTC
making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 3 Adam Young 2010-05-06 18:35:36 UTC
Handing off

Comment 4 Corey Welton 2010-09-13 20:16:04 UTC
Closing as WONTFIX per 9-Sept triage


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.