Bug 558249 - [abrt] crash in firefox-3.5.6-1.fc12
Summary: [abrt] crash in firefox-3.5.6-1.fc12
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: firefox
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gecko Maintainer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:174a669b161359c9636eb8d65f1...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-24 14:20 UTC by tomek.by
Modified: 2018-04-11 09:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-10 01:51:33 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (27.07 KB, text/plain)
2010-01-24 14:20 UTC, tomek.by
no flags Details

Description tomek.by 2010-01-24 14:20:32 UTC
abrt 1.0.3 detected a crash.

Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/lib/firefox-3.5.6/firefox
component: firefox
executable: /usr/lib/firefox-3.5.6/firefox
kernel: 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.i686
package: firefox-3.5.6-1.fc12
rating: 3
reason: Process was terminated by signal 6 (Aborted)

Comment 1 tomek.by 2010-01-24 14:20:35 UTC
Created attachment 386442 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Chris Campbell 2010-01-24 15:23:15 UTC
#7  0x009c7be8 in __assert_fail (assertion=<value optimized out>, 
    file=<value optimized out>, line=<value optimized out>, 
    function=<value optimized out>) at assert.c:81
        buf = 
    0xb3e52e80 "firefox: xcb_io.c:378: _XAllocID: Warunek zapewnienia `ret != inval_id' nie zosta\305\202 spe\305\202niony.\n"
#8  0x00143c0a in _XAllocID (dpy=0xb7562000) at xcb_io.c:378
        ret = 4294967295
        __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "_XAllocID"
#9  0x00118744 in XCreateGC (dpy=<value optimized out>, 
    d=<value optimized out>, valuemask=<value optimized out>, 
    values=<value optimized out>) at CrGC.c:93
        ext = <value optimized out>
#10 0x005e6e73 in _gdk_x11_gc_new (drawable=<value optimized out>, 
    values=<value optimized out>, values_mask=<value optimized out>)
    at gdkgc-x11.c:142
        gc = <value optimized out>
        private = 0xb33dc700 [GdkGCX11]
        xvalues = {function = 3, plane_mask = 3075611716, foreground = 
    3216350312, background = 1, line_width = -1219489534, line_style = 
    -1224156720, cap_style = 13368651, join_style = 13451890, fill_style = 0, 
          fill_rule = 0, arc_mode = 1, tile = 1, stipple = 3006979842, 
          ts_x_origin = -1219367680, ts_y_origin = -1078616952, font = 0, 
          subwindow_mode = 0, graphics_exposures = 0, clip_x_origin = 
    -1078616936, clip_y_origin = 6150849, clip_mask = 3007281856, 
          dash_offset = -1219064288, dashes = 3 '\003'}
        xvalues_mask = 4292865
        __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "_gdk_x11_gc_new"




-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 3 Chris Campbell 2010-01-24 15:43:19 UTC
Thanks for the bug report.  We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue.

First of all, could we get output of the command, saved in a text file and attached to this bug:

 $ rpm -qa *xulrun* *firefox* *mozilla* *flash* *plugin*

Please also install firefox-debuginfo.

 # debuginfo-install firefox

Then run firefox inside the gdb debugger. Please do the following:

 $ firefox -g

Stuff will appear. Ignore this until you get the gdb command prompt, then do:

 (gdb) run

Now, firefox should start up. Use it and reproduce the crash. When firefox crashes, you should be back to the gdb prompt. Now do:

 (gdb) thread apply all backtrace

More screens of stuff will occur. Copy all of this part to your editor of choice, such as gedit, and save it as an uncompressed file and attach it to this bug report.

We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information.

Thanks in advance, for your extra efforts.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2010-02-26 12:21:52 UTC
Could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you.

[Note please, that this is machine generated comment for large amount of bugs; due to some technical issues, it is possible we've missed some of the responses -- it is happens, please, just a make a comment about that; that we will see. Thank you]

Comment 5 Chris Campbell 2010-04-10 01:51:33 UTC

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.