Bug 559334 - e1000e: wol is broken on 2.6.18-185.el5 [rhel-5.3.z]
Summary: e1000e: wol is broken on 2.6.18-185.el5 [rhel-5.3.z]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andy Gospodarek
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 557974
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-27 19:26 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2014-06-29 23:02 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-17 04:03:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
rhel53z-e1000e-wol.patch (3.78 KB, patch)
2010-02-09 20:34 UTC, Andy Gospodarek
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0149 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: kernel security and bug fix update 2010-03-17 04:02:49 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-01-27 19:26:07 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #557974 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 3 Andy Gospodarek 2010-01-28 18:07:58 UTC
It looks like we will need to add the flags2 parameter to e1000e for 5.3.z.

Comment 4 Andy Gospodarek 2010-02-09 20:34:09 UTC
Created attachment 389842 [details]
rhel53z-e1000e-wol.patch

Proposed patch against rhel5.3.z.  I should have testing feedback shortly.

Comment 5 Andy Gospodarek 2010-02-09 21:47:12 UTC
I verified this against 2.6.18-128.13.1.el5.

Comment 7 Jiri Pirko 2010-03-01 16:00:21 UTC
in 2.6.18-128.14.1.el5

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-17 04:03:12 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0149.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.