Bug 560096 - Request to update GhostScript to 8.63 or higher
Summary: Request to update GhostScript to 8.63 or higher
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ghostscript
Version: 5.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact: QE Internationalization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 524282 5.6RelNotes 565776
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-29 20:17 UTC by Irina Boverman
Modified: 2011-01-13 22:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ghostscript-8.70-1.el5
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
OPVP 1.0 support has been added.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-13 22:06:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0137 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ghostscript bug fix and enhancement update 2011-01-12 19:26:44 UTC

Description Irina Boverman 2010-01-29 20:17:34 UTC 
Description of problem:

LSB 4.1 proposed update calls for guaranteed OPVP 1.0
support, which would require updating GhostScript to 8.63 or better. 
Would it be possible to upgrade this package for RHEL 5.5/5.4?
Comment 1 Irina Boverman 2010-02-02 20:22:30 UTC 
Moved this request to RHEL 5.6 per development recommendation.
Comment 8 Jaromir Hradilek 2010-07-20 09:58:20 UTC 
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.

New Contents:
OPVP 1.0 support has been added.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2011-01-13 22:06:55 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0137.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.