Summary: SELinux is preventing mono (unlabeled_t) "signal" to <Unknown> (unlabeled_t). Detailed Description: SELinux denied access requested by mono. It is not expected that this access is required by mono and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access. Allowing Access: You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ (http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi) against this package. Additional Information: Source Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 Target Context system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 Target Objects None [ process ] Source mono Source Path /usr/bin/mono Port <Unknown> Host (removed) Source RPM Packages mono-core-1.9.1-2.fc9 Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.3.1-42.fc9 Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Plugin Name catchall Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Thu May 1 06:28:41 EDT 2008 i686 i686 Alert Count 2 First Seen Tue 02 Jan 2001 01:52:59 AM LKT Last Seen Tue 02 Jan 2001 01:52:59 AM LKT Local ID 08c72320-9d59-429e-97ae-c42a54ec2cc0 Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages node=(removed) type=AVC msg=audit(978378779.949:128): avc: denied { signal } for pid=2237 comm="mono" scontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 tclass=process node=(removed) type=SYSCALL msg=audit(978378779.949:128): arch=40000003 syscall=270 per=400000 success=no exit=-13 a0=8bb a1=8bd a2=6 a3=921e770 items=0 ppid=1 pid=2237 auid=500 uid=500 gid=500 euid=500 suid=500 fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=1 comm="mono" exe="/usr/bin/mono" subj=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 key=(null) Hash String generated from selinux-policy-3.3.1-42.fc9,catchall,mono,unlabeled_t,unlabeled_t,process,signal audit2allow suggests: #============= unlabeled_t ============== allow unlabeled_t self:process signal;
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 560154 ***