Shouldn't glib+10 be renamed into glib+10-compat for consistency with other compat packages?
There are quite a few other similar names qt1x, db1/2/3, libjpeg6a, libxml10, openssl095a/96 The *ompat packages are often something different - jury rigged sets of compatibility libraries to deal with major changes (compat-egcs, compat-libs). Anyways, glib10/gtk+10 are at the end of their useful life; they were introduced in Red Hat 6.0; the last time we shipped a GTK+-1.0 development enviroment was in 5.2, a release we no longer support.