Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 566058

Summary: Update password policy doc in Admin Guide
Product: [Retired] freeIPA Reporter: David O'Brien <daobrien>
Component: DocumentationAssignee: David O'Brien <daobrien>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 2.0CC: benl, dpal, jgalipea, rcritten
Target Milestone: v2 releaseKeywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 646255 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-14 03:37:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 431022, 489811, 646217, 646255    

Description David O'Brien 2010-02-17 01:29:22 UTC
Description of problem:
IPA V2 has a revised password policy and this needs to be added to the appropriate section in the Admin Guide:

The V1 policy is defined at 
> http://freeipa.org/docs/1.2/Administration_Guide/en-US/html/sect-Administration_Guide-Configuring_Authorization-Managing_IPA_Policy.html#sect-Administration_Guide-Managing_IPA_Policy-Specifying_the_Password_Policy 
>

First attempt at V2 policy done by rcrit at http://freeipa.org/page/GroupPasswordPolicy

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 David O'Brien 2010-09-14 07:16:51 UTC
Rob,
is the info in the links provided above still accurate and the latest we have available?

thanks

Comment 3 Rob Crittenden 2010-09-14 19:26:05 UTC
Yes. I updated the output of the v2 group password policy so it matches the current CLI.

Comment 4 David O'Brien 2011-01-14 03:37:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 646255 ***