Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libucil.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libucil-0.9.8-1.src.rpm Description: Unicap provides a uniform interface to video capture devices. It allows applications to use any supported video capture device via a single API. The related ucil library provides easy to use functions to render text and graphic overlays onto video images. Please note, that this a re-review request, because the unicap package was splitted up by upstream into libunicap, libucil and libunicapgtk. Ensure to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process when reviewing this package. Note that only all three libraries together replace the unicap package, that's why there's no provides, just obsoletes.
Ok, this is a re-review request due to upstream name change. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches XX - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: be48e766945a9a54bdf50fc0bbe39200 libucil-0.9.8.tar.gz NN - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct NN - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. NN - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. NN - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - final provides and requires are sane: Issues: License included in the tar says GPLv3+ But the source says GPLv2+. Would be nice to know what upstream really want. Though i cant find anything that says it's considered a blocker. I have checked for obsoletes and provides. I had a chat in IRC with the maintainer and this seems to be the sane way. APPROVED
Thank you for reviewing the package. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libucil Short Description: Library to render text and graphic overlays onto video images Owners: robert Branches: EL-5 F-11 F-12 F-13 InitialCC:
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
libucil-0.9.8-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libucil-0.9.8-1.fc13
libucil-0.9.8-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libucil-0.9.8-1.el5
libucil-0.9.8-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libucil-0.9.8-1.fc12
libucil-0.9.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libucil-0.9.8-1.fc11
libucil-0.9.8-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
libucil-0.9.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
libucil-0.9.8-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
libucil-0.9.8-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.