Bug 568305 - [x86_64]: copy_user_c can zero more data than needed [rhel-5.2.z]
Summary: [x86_64]: copy_user_c can zero more data than needed [rhel-5.2.z]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Pirko
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 490938
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-02-25 11:05 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2018-10-27 11:40 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-17 03:19:02 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
reproduce on kernel 2.6.18-92.el5 (278.06 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-03-09 03:02 UTC, yanfu,wang
no flags Details
verify on kernel 2.6.18-92.1.37 (188.16 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-03-09 03:03 UTC, yanfu,wang
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0148 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: kernel security and bug fix update 2010-03-17 03:18:17 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-02-25 11:05:30 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #490938 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.2 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 3 Jiri Pirko 2010-03-01 15:57:29 UTC
in 2.6.18-92.1.36.el5

Comment 5 yanfu,wang 2010-03-09 03:02:12 UTC
Created attachment 398669 [details]
reproduce on kernel 2.6.18-92.el5

Comment 6 yanfu,wang 2010-03-09 03:03:27 UTC
Created attachment 398670 [details]
verify on kernel 2.6.18-92.1.37

Comment 7 yanfu,wang 2010-03-09 03:04:40 UTC
reproduce on kernel 5.2 GA and verify on kernel 2.6.18-92.1.37, no problem now, these results had been attached.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2010-03-17 03:19:02 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0148.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.