Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/detox.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/detox-1.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Detox is a utility designed to clean up file names. It replaces difficult to work with characters, such as spaces, with standard equivalents. It will also clean up file names with UTF-8 or Latin-1 (or CP-1252) characters in them.
OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/detox-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (BSD) OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license FIX - MUST: license file not included in %doc: There is a LICENSE OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 04f1bc8501cd40c21610ea3fee7a6fc5 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete Issues: - add %doc CHANGES LICENSE README - %{_usr}/share/%{name}: any reason not to use %{_datadir}/%{name} ? - Add "INSTALL='install -p'" to make install %doc %{_mandir}/man5/detox* %doc %{_mandir}/man1/detox* - rpmbuild automatically marks manpages as %doc (but it doesn't hurt to do it ether) Fix these and consider the package APPROVED.
Thanks. I have fixed the issues in Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/detox.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/detox-1.2.0-2.fc13.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: detox Short Description: Utility to replace problematic characters in file names Owners: slankes Branches: F-12 F-13 EL-5
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
detox-1.2.0-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/detox-1.2.0-2.fc13
detox-1.2.0-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update detox'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/detox-1.2.0-2.fc13
detox-1.2.0-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.