Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-right_rackspace.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-right_rackspace-0.0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Provides full programmatic access to Rackspace. Use this to interact with the Rackspace Cloud product.
Both SPEC and SRPM produce a 404 File Not Found error. Please re-post your spec and source rpm.
I'm sorry: Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace-0.0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
Some notes: * (Build)Requires - The following Requires are all not needed. These are for development dependencies, not for runtime: ------------------------------------------------------------ Requires: rubygem(rubyforge) >= 2.0.3 Requires: rubygem(gemcutter) >= 0.3.0 Requires: rubygem(hoe) >= 2.5.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ - The correct dependency should be "rubygem(right_http_connection)" - As lib/right_rackspace.rb contains: ------------------------------------------------------------ 29 require 'json' ------------------------------------------------------------ This package should have "Requires: rubygem(json)" * %check - As this package contains test/ directory, please add %check section and execute some test program there.
ping?
ping again?
Hi, I'm sorry, just working on it.
Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace-0.0.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > Some notes: > > * (Build)Requires > - The following Requires are all not needed. These are for development > dependencies, not for runtime: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Requires: rubygem(rubyforge) >= 2.0.3 > Requires: rubygem(gemcutter) >= 0.3.0 > Requires: rubygem(hoe) >= 2.5.0 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > - The correct dependency should be "rubygem(right_http_connection)" FIXED. > > - As lib/right_rackspace.rb contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 29 require 'json' > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This package should have "Requires: rubygem(json)" FIXED. > > * %check > - As this package contains test/ directory, please add %check > section and execute some test program there. NACK. This is not possible, because you need to supply your RackSpace credentials into test file. Thanks!
For -2: * rubygem(json) dependency - Well, ">= 1.2.0" dependency is really needed? Currently rubygem-json on Fedora rawhide is 1.1.9 (although the newest json is 1.4.1) * Permission ---------------------------------------------------------- rubygem-right_rackspace.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/right_rackspace-0.0.0.2/lib/support.rb ---------------------------------------------------------- - This script need not have executable permission.
(In reply to comment #8) > For -2: > > * rubygem(json) dependency > - Well, ">= 1.2.0" dependency is really needed? Currently rubygem-json > on Fedora rawhide is 1.1.9 (although the newest json is 1.4.1) FIXED. Btw. I can't find 'json_pure' gem in bugzilla. Do you know if it's packaged ? I think this gem is used more often than 'json' gem. > * Permission > ---------------------------------------------------------- > rubygem-right_rackspace.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/right_rackspace-0.0.0.2/lib/support.rb > ---------------------------------------------------------- > - This script need not have executable permission. FIXED. Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace-0.0.0.2-3.fc12.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #9) > SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/RPMS/rubygem-right_rackspace-0.0.0.2-3.fc12.src.rpm - seems 404? By the way (In reply to comment #9) > Btw. I can't find 'json_pure' gem in bugzilla. Do you know if it's packaged ? I > think this gem is used more often than 'json' gem. - json gem is not in Fedora currently. By the way while I am not the maintainer of json (json on Fedora is maintained by laxathom), as far as I compared json with json_pure, json has some additional C extension modules compared to json_pure and all files in json_pure are also included in json. So it seems that json_pure is not needed if json is in the distribution. Are there any reason why json_pure is preferred?
... Of course I meant "json_pure is not in Fedora currently", sorry.
Again ping?
I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK.
Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this one as a duplicate of the new one, thank you!