Bug 57063 - Slightly misleading comment in texmf.cnf
Summary: Slightly misleading comment in texmf.cnf
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: tetex
Version: 1.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tim Waugh
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2001-12-03 22:46 UTC by Michal Jaegermann
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-12-06 11:00:34 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2001:166 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Updated teTeX packages available 2001-12-11 05:00:00 UTC

Description Michal Jaegermann 2001-12-03 22:46:06 UTC
Description of Problem:
A comment in /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf says:

% Now, list all the texmf trees. If you have multiple trees you can
% use shell brace notation, like this:
%   TEXMF = {$HOMETEXMF,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFMAIN}

This should likely rather be "{!!$HOMETEXMF,".  A line just below is:

TEXMF = {!!$HOMETEXMF,!!$TEXMFMAIN}

but somebody new may not catch right away what is the meaning of
this difference.

A comment to a sample TEXMFLOCAL should also likely explain that
a tree below this directory has to be created.  A minimum would
be 'tex/generic/'.  Otherwise somebody will drop new files in
$TEXMFLOCAL and s/he will start to wonder why they are not found
even after rehashing was done.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tetex-1.0.7-36.4

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2001-12-06 11:00:29 UTC
The '!!' construct is explained near the top of the file.

I've added a comment about how to use HOMETEXMF though, including an 
instruction to run texhash on it.


Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2001-12-11 09:47:10 UTC
Fixed in tetex-1.0.7-37.



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.