Bug 575752 - [abrt] crash in w3m-0.5.2-15.fc12: Process /usr/bin/w3m was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in w3m-0.5.2-15.fc12: Process /usr/bin/w3m was killed by signal ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: w3m
Version: 12
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag Nemade
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:94f636b14840fae853fa53bf99a...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-03-22 10:42 UTC by Robert Binkhorst
Modified: 2010-06-30 10:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-30 10:22:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (11.18 KB, text/plain)
2010-03-22 10:42 UTC, Robert Binkhorst
no flags Details

Description Robert Binkhorst 2010-03-22 10:42:28 UTC
abrt 1.0.8 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: w3m -o indent_incr=0 -o multicol=false -o no_cache=true -o use_cookie=false -o display_charset=utf8 -o system_charset=utf8 -o follow_locale=false -o use_language_tag=true -o ucs_conv=true -T text/html -dump /home/rbinkhorst/buildroot/BUILD/xulrunner-1.9.0.10/mozilla/layout/generic/crashtests/323386-1.html
comment: No idea, it popped up in ABRT
component: w3m
executable: /usr/bin/w3m
kernel: 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64
package: w3m-0.5.2-15.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/w3m was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 Robert Binkhorst 2010-03-22 10:42:31 UTC
Created attachment 401694 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Parag Nemade 2010-05-24 09:21:51 UTC
Are you still able to reproduce this?

Comment 3 Robert Binkhorst 2010-05-25 08:32:57 UTC
I've not seen it dump core again, but maybe I just didn't trigger it. As I'm unsure why it crashed on me it's hard to say whether it's resolved or not... I guess since no-one else has attached to this BZ and it's not happened again you can close it and it will re-open if it happens again.

Comment 4 Parag Nemade 2010-05-25 08:37:24 UTC
Actually few other people do found this bug but when asked them are you able to reproduce they said no.

So, it looks strange why it happened only once to all such bug reporters.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.