Bug 576758 - (moovida-plugins-bad) Review Request: moovida-plugins-bad - Media Center
Review Request: moovida-plugins-bad - Media Center
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Hans de Goede
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: Reopened
Depends On: moovida
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-03-24 23:49 EDT by Graeme Gillies
Modified: 2010-10-05 05:23 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc13
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-09-30 02:08:40 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
hdegoede: fedora‑review+
kevin: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Graeme Gillies 2010-03-24 23:49:31 EDT

I have made some packages for Moovida which is a rename of elisa media centre
which is currently in Fedora. I have yet to be sponsored so I am looking for
someone who can sponsor me as well as review this package.

This bug is for tracking the review request of the moovida-plugins-bad package
used by moovida



Thanks :)
Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2010-07-12 06:12:50 EDT
Closing this as the master moovida package review bug 554243 has been marked as a dead review.

Graeme, I would love to see mooodiva in Fedora, so if you're still interested in packaging up moovida and getting this into Fedora, feel free to re-open. And I'll try to help you sort out any technical issues and sponsor you.


Comment 2 Graeme Gillies 2010-07-14 19:55:23 EDT

I have fixed a couple of outstanding issues with this package including changing the %excludes to be removed during %install instead, and getting rid of the duplicate file errors, and now have new packages for review


Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2010-08-04 11:04:56 EDT
As I offered in the -bad and -good plugins reviews I'll review this and when that is done sponsor you. I hope to finish reviewing at least the base package today before my short vacation.
Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2010-09-12 15:24:56 EDT

Sorry for the long delay. I recently switched teams with in Red Hat and as such
have been overwhelmed with work a bit. Here is a full review of this package:

Full review:

- rpmlint checks return:
moovida-plugins-bad.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://www.moovida.com/media/public/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9.tar.gz HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
moovida-plugins-bad.noarch: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Well the one of the 403 error is not so good, so below
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPLv3) OK, text not %doc, but also not in upstream tarbal, so no
  problem, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
  Could not check, as the upstream url is giving 403 errors? I double
  checked the url and it is the one from upstreams download page.
  So I wilol just assume this is a temporary glitch and believe the tarbal in
  the srpm is the correct one.
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime

Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2010-09-12 15:47:31 EDT
Hi Graeme,

What is your FAS account name? Once I have that I'll add you to the packagers group and sponsor you, then you can do the request for creating a git repo for the moovida package, import, build, etc.


Comment 6 Graeme Gillies 2010-09-12 19:57:31 EDT
Hi Hans,

Thanks for finishing the reviews!

I had a look at the url giving 403 errors and it seems that only the moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9.tar.gz link isn't working. The page with them all is at http://www.moovida.com/download/moovidaclassic/

My FAS account name is ggillies


Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2010-09-13 03:49:32 EDT

(In reply to comment #6)
> My FAS account name is ggillies

You've been added to packagers and sponsored :)


Comment 8 Graeme Gillies 2010-09-13 20:18:32 EDT
New Package SCM Request
Package Name: moovida-plugins-bad
Short Description: This package contains plug-ins that have licensing issues, aren't tested well enough, or the code is not of good enough quality for the Moovida media centre
Owners: ggillies
Branches: f13 f14
Comment 9 Kevin Fenzi 2010-09-14 00:34:59 EDT
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2010-09-21 21:36:23 EDT
moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc14,moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-3.fc14,moovida-1.0.9-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2010-09-21 21:39:27 EDT
moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc13,moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-3.fc13,moovida-1.0.9-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2010-09-22 14:43:07 EDT
moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc14, moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-3.fc14, moovida-1.0.9-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update moovida-plugins-bad moovida-plugins-good moovida'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc14,moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-3.fc14,moovida-1.0.9-3.fc14
Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2010-09-30 02:08:24 EDT
moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc14, moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-3.fc14, moovida-1.0.9-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2010-10-05 05:23:35 EDT
moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-3.fc13, moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-3.fc13, moovida-1.0.9-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.