Bug 576976 - --onpart does not remove existing format first
Summary: --onpart does not remove existing format first
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda
Version: 13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Chris Lumens
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: anaconda_trace_hash:0836e5f7c09b27090...
Depends On:
Blocks: F13Blocker, F13FinalBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-03-25 19:05 UTC by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-17 03:22 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: anaconda-13.38-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 578937 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-06 21:33:54 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda. (173.30 KB, text/plain)
2010-03-25 19:05 UTC, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details

Description Bill Nottingham 2010-03-25 19:05:39 UTC
The following was filed automatically by anaconda:
anaconda 13.35 exception report
Traceback (most recent call first):
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devices.py", line 2039, in size
    size += max(0, self.align(pv.size - pv.format.peStart))
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devices.py", line 2057, in freeSpace
    size = self.size
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/partitioning.py", line 1533, in growLVM
    total_free = vg.freeSpace
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/partitioning.py", line 220, in doAutoPartition
    growLVM(anaconda.storage)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 205, in moveStep
    rc = stepFunc(self.anaconda)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 126, in gotoNext
    self.moveStep()
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/text.py", line 659, in run
    anaconda.dispatch.gotoNext()
  File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 1187, in <module>
    anaconda.intf.run(anaconda)
AttributeError: 'Ext4FS' object has no attribute 'peStart'

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2010-03-25 19:05:43 UTC
Created attachment 402649 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2010-03-25 19:06:20 UTC
This happened when attempting to replace a lvm formatted system with:

part / --onpart=sda2 --fstype=ext4
part /boot --onpart=sda1 --fstype=ext4

Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2010-03-25 19:14:25 UTC
ks is:

install
url --url=http://download.fedora.devel.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/13/x86_64/os/
lang en_US.UTF-8
keyboard us
network --device eth0 --bootproto dhcp
firewall --service=ssh
authconfig --enableshadow --passalgo=sha512 --enablefingerprint
selinux --enforcing
timezone --utc America/New_York
bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=sda --append="rhgb quiet"
repo --name=updates-testing --mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-testing-f$releasever&arch=$basearch

#clearpart --all
part / --onpart=sda2 --fstype=ext4
part /boot --onpart=sda1 --fstype=ext4

%packages --ignoremissing
ConsoleKit-devel
<a bunch of other stuff>

Comment 4 David Lehman 2010-03-25 19:20:32 UTC
We aren't scheduling format destroy actions for the preexisting formats when handling onpart. We need to be doing a recursive destroy starting with those formats, eg: lvmpv->lvmvg->lvmlv(s)

Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2010-05-03 18:31:18 UTC
Bill, this should be fixed in current builds (inc. TC1), as per the 'fixed in' field. Can you please test and confirm? Thanks.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 6 Adam Williamson 2010-05-04 23:16:07 UTC
Ping?

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2010-05-05 15:37:57 UTC
I have not had time to test this.

Comment 8 Adam Williamson 2010-05-06 13:48:26 UTC
So, to test this correctly, all you need to do is do a kickstart install using --onpart to ask the installer to convert a partition currently occupied by an LVM into a raw ext4 partition, right?



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2010-05-06 16:15:16 UTC
Correct.

Comment 10 Adam Williamson 2010-05-06 16:30:17 UTC
okay, I should be able to test this later today.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 11 Adam Williamson 2010-05-06 20:19:25 UTC
Tested this with 0505 boot.iso. Seems to work. I first did an install with default partitioning - so a swap partition and an LVM with / and /boot. Then I replaced it with this ks: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/test.ks . It uses the original /boot partition as swap, and replaces the LVM with an ext4 / partition. It got happily through partitioning stage and started installing packages, whereupon I stopped it because I don't have all night. :)

Comment 12 Jesse Keating 2010-05-06 21:33:54 UTC
Closing this since the update is already pushed to stable.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.