Bug 579454 - Fedora 13 PPC64 Internal Build(20100310) - Text mode default Installation not doing 1st reboot successfully and hanging
Summary: Fedora 13 PPC64 Internal Build(20100310) - Text mode default Installation not...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 14
Hardware: ppc64
OS: All
low
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 595417
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-04-05 09:40 UTC by IBM Bug Proxy
Modified: 2011-08-24 19:27 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 595417 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-08-24 19:27:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
IBM Linux Technology Center 61715 0 None None None Never

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2010-04-05 09:40:33 UTC
SACHIN P. SANT <sachinp.com>-
 After 1st stage of TEXT MODE INSTALLATION completes, the systems (p55 -power5 )
segfaults on 1st reboot.  Just before the segfault following badness message is
displayed on the console :

returning from prom_init
Phyp-dump not supported on this hardware
ibmvscsi 3000000b: fast_fail not supported in server
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at lib/dma-debug.c:820
sd 0:0:1:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
sd 0:0:1:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
sd 0:0:1:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through

This same badness message can be recreated with latest upstream kernels. Here
is the complete back trace(against vanilla kernel) :

ibmvscsi 30000003: Client reserve enabled
ibmvscsi 30000003: sent SRP login
ibmvscsi 30000003: SRP_LOGIN succeeded
ibmvscsi 30000003: DMA-API: device driver frees DMA memory with wrong function
[device address=0x0000000000011520] [size=36 bytes] [mapped as scather-gather]
[unmapped as single]
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at lib/dma-debug.c:820
NIP: c00000000039bd24 LR: c00000000039bd20 CTR: c0000000000704a4
REGS: c00000000f69f6f0 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W   (2.6.34-rc3)
MSR: 8000000000029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR>  CR: 48000082  XER: 00000004
TASK = c00000000125cc70[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c000000001324000 CPU: 0
GPR00: c00000000039bd20 c00000000f69f970 c000000001322e38 00000000000000b6
GPR04: 0000000000000001 c0000000000c1ea8 0000000000000000 
0000000000000002
GPR08: 0000000000000000 c00000000125cc70 0000000000000f66 0000000000000001
GPR12: 0000000000000002 c00000000f669000 0000000000d47940 0000000001c00000
GPR16: ffffffffffffffff 0000000002673148 00000000018ff984 0000000000000006
GPR20: 0000000000000000 c000000000c7bb80 0000000000000000 
0000000000000000
GPR24: 0000000000000001 c000000001de6b00 0000000000000001 c000000001de6f80
GPR28: c000000109c696b0 c00000000f69fa90 c0000000012acab0 c00000000f69f970
NIP [c00000000039bd24] .check_unmap+0x3e0/0x784
LR [c00000000039bd20] .check_unmap+0x3dc/0x784
Call Trace:
[c00000000f69f970] [c00000000039bd20] .check_unmap+0x3dc/0x784 (unreliable)
[c00000000f69fa20] [c00000000039c3dc] .debug_dma_unmap_page+0x98/0xc8
[c00000000f69fb60] [d000000001dd63f4] .unmap_cmd_data+0xd0/0x11c [ibmvscsic]
[c00000000f69fc00] [d000000001dd8878] .handle_cmd_rsp+0xe0/0x154 [ibmvscsic]
[c00000000f69fca0] [d000000001dd7694] .ibmvscsi_handle_crq+0x44c/0x500
[ibmvscsic]
[c00000000f69fd40] [d000000001ddaca4] .rpavscsi_task+0x50/0xd8 [ibmvscsic]
[c00000000f69fdf0] [c0000000000c9e84] .tasklet_action+0x108/0x1d4
[c00000000f69fea0] [c0000000000cb778] .__do_softirq+0x168/0x2b8
[c00000000f69ff90] [c0000000000337b0] .call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[c000000001327840] [c000000000010664] .do_softirq+0xa0/0x104
[c0000000013278e0] [c0000000000cb0e4] .irq_exit+0x70/0xd0
[c000000001327960] [c00000000000fee4] .do_IRQ+0x214/0x2d8
[c000000001327a20] [c000000000004d28] hardware_interrupt_entry+0x28/0x2c
--- Exception: 501 at .raw_local_irq_restore+0xc0/0xdc
   LR = .cpu_idle+0x12c/0x1d0
[c000000001327d10] [c000000001290a28] mv88e6131_switch_driver+0x8da0/0x35588
(unreliable)
[c000000001327db0] [c000000000017e14] .cpu_idle+0x12c/0x1d0
[c000000001327e50] [c00000000000a71c] .rest_init+0xe8/0x10c
[c000000001327ee0] [c000000000a12e38] .start_kernel+0x4ec/0x510
[c000000001327f90] [c000000000008c64] .start_here_common+0x2c/0x48
Instruction dump:
e81c001a e93d001a e97e8030 78001f24 79291f24 e87e80c0 e8dd0028 e8fd0030
7d0b002a 7d2b482a 48393a49 60000000 <0fe00000> 480000b8 2f800003 409e00f4
Mapped at:
[<c00000000039c76c>] .debug_dma_map_sg+0xa0/0x220
[<c0000000005085c4>] .scsi_dma_map+0x120/0x164
[<d000000001dd8a6c>] .ibmvscsi_queuecommand+0x180/0x5d0 [ibmvscsic]
[<c0000000004fd9b4>] .scsi_dispatch_cmd+0x21c/0x2cc
[<c000000000506058>] .scsi_request_fn+0x3cc/0x57c
scsi 0:0:1:0: Direct-Access     AIX      VDASD            0001 PQ: 0 ANSI: 3

This problem has been reported to community. Here is the link :
http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-April/081541.html

The following patch should fix this issue :

http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2010-April/081545.html

Please include the above patch in F13.

Comment 1 IBM Bug Proxy 2010-05-03 18:52:13 UTC
------- Comment From Subrata Modak subrata.ibm.com 2010-05-03 14:43 EDT-------
The issue is still reproducible with . The following error still occurs. Probably, the proposed patch has not made to the fedora packages:

Segmentation fault
No root device found
Segmentation fault
No root device found
Boot has failed, sleeping forever.

Redhat,

Any Information on this ?

Regards--
Subrata

Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2010-05-04 12:14:02 UTC
------- Comment From Subrata Modak subrata.ibm.com 2010-05-04 07:53 EDT-------
Redhat,

Any news about this patch going into Fedora Kernel?

Regards--
Subrata

Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2010-06-10 10:43:12 UTC
------- Comment From  2010-06-10 06:29 EDT-------
I checked the today's fedora kernel/devel/kernel-2.6.34/linux-2.6.34.noarch and I has the patch merged.

Comment 4 IBM Bug Proxy 2010-06-16 17:06:02 UTC
------- Comment From edpollar.com 2010-06-16 12:02 EDT-------
reassigning QA...

Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 11:14:52 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle.
Changing version to '14'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 6 IBM Bug Proxy 2010-07-30 11:41:00 UTC
------- Comment From Subrata Modak subrata.ibm.com 2010-07-30 07:35 EDT-------
>EDT-------
>This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14
>development cycle.

Nope. This was produced during Fedora 13 Alpha release itself. And still appears in the F13-GA kernel (2.6.33.3-85).

Regards--
Subrata

>Changing version to '14'.
>
>More information and reason for this action is here:
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 7 Josh Boyer 2011-08-24 19:27:04 UTC
Fedora 13 is EOL and there was never a supported ppc64 release.  Closing this out.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.