Bug 581605 - kernel update breaks Intel graphics REGRESSION
Summary: kernel update breaks Intel graphics REGRESSION
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adam Jackson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-04-12 18:53 UTC by Richard Z.
Modified: 2010-12-03 15:59 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-12-03 15:59:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
/var/log/messages (60.55 KB, text/plain)
2010-04-12 18:53 UTC, Richard Z.
no flags Details
boot messages 2.6.32-0.48.rc7.git1.fc13.i686, showing ooops (51.62 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-04-20 21:48 UTC, Richard Z.
no flags Details
messages from 2.6.31.12-174.2.19.fc12.i686.PAE (49.37 KB, text/plain)
2010-04-20 21:55 UTC, Richard Z.
no flags Details

Description Richard Z. 2010-04-12 18:53:39 UTC
Created attachment 406039 [details]
/var/log/messages

Description of problem:

after upgrading to 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE the screen reamins completely dark during and after boot. I can blindly type the dm-crypt pashphrase, the system boots, gdm is started but nothing ever appears on screen.

Grub entry:

title Fedora (2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE)
        root (hd0,1)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_netbook-lv_root  LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=de-mobii
        initrd /initramfs-2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE.img

This is a typical 1st gen Atom based netbook with Intel Graphic, never had any problems with it. For HW details please see attached /var/log/messages and
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_60ee46a0-1f44-40bf-b7ce-b9c82789c940

Last version that worked for me was a selfcompiled kernel.org 2.6.32.8

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2010-04-20 16:21:12 UTC
What's the last kernel build that works, for you? Can you provide the log from a boot on that kernel, for comparison?

If you take 'rhgb quiet' out of the kernel parameter list, does the behaviour change? What happens if you add the parameter 'nomodeset'?

Thanks.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 2 Richard Z. 2010-04-20 17:35:39 UTC
- can you please point me at a list of older kernel builds to try?

- removing rhgb quiet did not change anything (when tried with the F13-2.6.33.1 build I could see the messages till well after ramdisk took over but went black before asking for dm-crypt password - latest msg that flashed by was not surprisingly something DRM related)

- will try nomodeset and the other things in a few hours

Comment 3 Tomasz Torcz 2010-04-20 17:43:45 UTC
Richard, for older kernel look at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8

Comment 4 Richard Z. 2010-04-20 21:43:23 UTC
tried a few kernels, last one that worked "out of the box" was 2.6.31.12-174.2.19.fc12.i686.PAE, will add dmesg in a while.

Perhaps more interesting is the behavior of 2.6.32-0.48.rc7.git1.fc13.i686. Booted with default options it recorded an oops in the Intel drm code. It did continue booting, kdm started but nothing was visible on screen. Console switching worked though so I was able to login into it.

Also tested all kernels again with nomodeset and they booted without problems, kdm started and I was able to login.

Comment 5 Richard Z. 2010-04-20 21:48:09 UTC
Created attachment 407932 [details]
boot messages 2.6.32-0.48.rc7.git1.fc13.i686, showing ooops

did boot, kdm started but screen black, could switch to different VT and login

Comment 6 Richard Z. 2010-04-20 21:55:48 UTC
Created attachment 407934 [details]
messages from 2.6.31.12-174.2.19.fc12.i686.PAE

last known version that booted with default parameters, graphical boot and modesetting

Comment 7 Sean Lawton 2010-06-08 03:17:58 UTC
It sounds like I am having the same problem.  Kernel 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686 runs on a Dell E6410 with an intel chip set.  Upon updating to 2.6.32 I get a blank screen at boot.  If I add nomodeset to grub then I see the scrolling bar at the bottom of the screen, but then it goes blank where I would expect a login screen.

Anyway, I am very interested in solving this.

Can I offer some data?

Thanks,

Sean Lawton

Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2010-11-03 17:17:46 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 12.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '12'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2010-12-03 15:59:46 UTC
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is 
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further 
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of 
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.