Bug 58210 - Please use correct version label
Summary: Please use correct version label
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: autoconf
Version: 1.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jens Petersen
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-01-11 01:24 UTC by Enrico Scholz
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-02-01 09:04:12 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Enrico Scholz 2002-01-11 01:24:14 UTC
Description of Problem:

autoconf-2.52-5 contains autoconf-2.52f in reality; old ...-2.52-4 was -2.52d.
This relabeling is very confusing...

I don't see a reason why this packages can not be named as 'autoconf-2.52f-1' or
so. RPM works fine and can distinguish between this versions correctly:

----
$ python
>>> import rpm
>>> rpm.labelCompare(['0','2.52','1'], ['0','2.52d','1'])
-1
>>> rpm.labelCompare(['0','2.52d','1'], ['0','2.52','1'])
1
>>> rpm.labelCompare(['0','2.52d','1'], ['0','2.52f','1'])
-1
>>> rpm.labelCompare(['0','2.52f','1'], ['0','2.52d','1'])
1
----

Therefore, rpm would see the packages in order of

| autoconf-2.52-1 < autoconf-2.52d-1 < autoconf-2.52f-1

and upgrading will work without '--force' or so.

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2002-02-01 08:25:00 UTC
autoconf-2.52g-1 fixes this.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2002-02-01 09:04:07 UTC
oops, forgot that autoconf-2.52g requires automake-1.5b.
This will have to wait a little more. :(

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2002-02-04 04:55:14 UTC
really fixed in 2.52-7 (reverted to 2.52 release).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.