Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 5825 - Non-X Emacs fails due to missing file
Non-X Emacs fails due to missing file
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: emacs (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Cristian Gafton
: 6224 8964 9522 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 1999-10-11 04:43 EDT by Mike Bird
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-02-16 17:45:43 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Mike Bird 1999-10-11 04:43:16 EDT
I installed i386 RH 6.1 and chose the Server configuration.

After succesful install, Emacs fails due to missing file:

This can be fixed, albeit inelegantly, by installing:

The fix is non-obvious unless you have an old RH to query!

The install was from the CD-ROM image on ftp.cdrom.com

We'll be buying 6.1 Professional as soon as it's out.

Comment 1 Gregory Leblanc 2000-01-29 01:44:59 EST
I've confirmed this bug on two systems, it's not a problem specific to Intel, it
also happens on SPARC.  Sounds like there's a glitch in the .spec file.
Comment 2 Cristian Gafton 2000-02-03 21:52:59 EST
*** Bug 6224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Cristian Gafton 2000-02-03 21:57:59 EST
*** Bug 8964 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Preston Brown 2000-02-16 10:18:59 EST
Cristian, how do you want to fix this for 6.2?
Comment 5 Cristian Gafton 2000-02-16 11:26:59 EST
Still tryiong to figure out how to make the damn .elc files recompile when
rebuilding emacs.
Comment 6 Cristian Gafton 2000-02-16 17:45:59 EST
fixed in the devel tree.
Comment 7 Cristian Gafton 2000-02-17 09:50:59 EST
*** Bug 9522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.