+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #584007 +++ Description of problem: Return of a command substitution from within another command substitution causes stdin of coprocess to be closed in a ksh script. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ksh-20100309-3.fc14.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Execute the following script in ksh: ####################################### #!/bin/ksh set -e co_process() { while read line do printf "\n%s(): Read line from 'stdin'\n" "${.sh.fun}" >/dev/tty done printf "\n%s(): Exiting -- EOF on read of 'stdin'.\n" "${.sh.fun}" >/dev/tty # kill the main shell process when the end-of-file is detected on 'stdin'. kill $$ } co_process |& loop_count=0 while : do (( loop_count++ )) printf "%05d: %s\r" "${loop_count}" "$( echo $( /bin/ls ) )" done ####################################### Actual results: Script ends with the following output: test_script.ksh: Exiting -- EOF on read of 'stdin'.\n Expected results: Script should run in an infinite loop. Additional info: --- Additional comment from spoyarek on 2010-04-20 09:50:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=407821) Close coprocess file descriptors only if the coprocess pid is nonzero The root cause for this is the race condition between the job_reap called within the signal handler and job_wait in the parent process. job_reap sets the lastpid to the pid of the process that exited last, so if job_wait is called after it, it correctly compares a valid pid against the coprocess pid to see if it is the coprocess that has ended. But in case of a command substitution, the job env (including the coprocess pid) is backed up and reinitialized, hence making the coprocess pid 0. In this case, if job_wait happens to execute before job_reap, it compares the 0 coprocess id with the 0 lastpid (since it has not been set through the signal handler yet) and goes on to close the coprocess assuming that it has quit. Attached fix ensures that the coprocess pid is actually set before trying to close its handlers. --- Additional comment from mhlavink on 2010-04-20 10:38:50 EDT --- Hi, thanks for the report and especially for the patch. I can reproduce this bug and confirm attached patch fixes it. I've emailed all information to upstream and I'm waiting for their response.
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
This request was erroneously denied for the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The error has been fixed and this request has been re-proposed for the current release.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0159.html