Bug 586049 – [abrt] crash in lyx-1.6.5-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/lyx was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 586049 - [abrt] crash in lyx-1.6.5-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/lyx was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in lyx-1.6.5-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/lyx was killed by signal 6...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 571272

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	lyx (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Rex Dieter
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:71b5b94709feef05bd01a42dc47...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-04-26 13:37 EDT by Jayesh Badwaik
Modified:	2010-05-25 05:03 EDT (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:03:11 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (45.38 KB, text/plain) 2010-04-26 13:37 EDT, Jayesh Badwaik	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Jayesh Badwaik 2010-04-26 13:37:54 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/lyx
component: lyx
executable: /usr/bin/lyx
global_uuid: 71b5b94709feef05bd01a42dc473eeaca0620a06
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: lyx-1.6.5-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/lyx was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 Jayesh Badwaik 2010-04-26 13:37:59 EDT

Created attachment 409240 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:03:11 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 571272 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:03:11 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #571272.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.