Bug 586134 – [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.0-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bug 586134 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.0-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.0-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed ...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 573800

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	nautilus (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	13
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:9bcc19f5b1571eeb5b1b8756834...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-04-26 17:21 EDT by leigh scott
Modified:	2015-03-03 17:47 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 06:28:12 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (23.25 KB, text/plain) 2010-04-26 17:22 EDT, leigh scott	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description leigh scott 2010-04-26 17:21:58 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 9bcc19f5b1571eeb5b1b8756834f8404ee53127d
kernel: 2.6.33.2-57.fc13.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.30.0-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

Comment 1 leigh scott 2010-04-26 17:22:01 EDT

Created attachment 409295 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 06:28:12 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 573800 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 06:28:12 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #573800.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.