Bug 58624 - lists inside para produce incorrect troff
lists inside para produce incorrect troff
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Red Hat Raw Hide
Classification: Retired
Component: xmlto (Show other bugs)
1.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
Tim Waugh
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2002-01-21 14:06 EST by Tammy Fox
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:39 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-01-21 14:10:12 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tammy Fox 2002-01-21 14:06:06 EST
Description of Problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional Information:
Comment 1 Tammy Fox 2002-01-21 14:10:07 EST
Sorry. Apparently pressing enter in the summary text field submits the bug!

Anyway, having

<para>
	  Exceptions are represented in two ways: 


	<itemizedlist>
	  <listitem>
	    <para>As a single bit (exception present/absent) with these bits
	      corresponding in some implementation-defined way with bit
	      positions in an integer.</para>
	  </listitem>
	</itemizedlist>
	  
	<itemizedlist>
	  <listitem>
	    <para>As an opaque structure that may contain more information            about
	      the exception (for example, the code address where it occurred).</para>
	  </listitem>
	</itemizedlist>

	</para>	

produces 

Exceptions are represented in two ways: .TP 3 \(bu As a single bit (exception
present/absent) with these bits corresponding in some implementation-defined way
with bit positions in an integer. .LP .TP 3 \(bu As an opaque structure that may
contain more information about the exception (for example, the code address
where it occurred). .LP


Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2002-01-21 17:58:49 EST
Should be fixed in xmlto-0.0.7-1, although it's kinda hacky.  I can't think of 
a _good_ way of fixing it.  Do the lists have to be inside the paras?
Comment 3 Tammy Fox 2002-01-21 19:03:28 EST
Lists don't have to be inside paras, but since it is a valid markup
I thought it should be fixed. In general, lists should not be
put inside paras because it leaves unnecessary white space in
the PS/PDF output.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.