Bug 586289 – [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Bug 586289 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed ...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 572977

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	nautilus (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:cf167f91563006221b6a9f44a05...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-04-27 04:55 EDT by Ronald Canete
Modified:	2015-03-03 17:47 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:41:43 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (24.13 KB, text/plain) 2010-04-27 04:55 EDT, Ronald Canete	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Ronald Canete 2010-04-27 04:55:34 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: cf167f91563006221b6a9f44a05a3262db8b9103
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE
package: nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 Ronald Canete 2010-04-27 04:55:44 EDT

Created attachment 409400 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:41:43 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 572977 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:41:43 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #572977.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.