RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 587911 - No mention of SRP being a supported "virtual" storage type
Summary: No mention of SRP being a supported "virtual" storage type
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Virtualization_Administration_Guide
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Christopher Curran
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2010-05-01 14:24 UTC by Justin Clift
Modified: 2011-12-06 01:02 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-08-31 04:23:23 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Justin Clift 2010-05-01 14:24:55 UTC
Description of problem:

"Section 23 Virtualization storage topics" in the Virtualization Guide, & "Section 23 Virtual Storage" in the Storage Guide makes no mention of SRP being a supported storage type, even though the kernel modules and user space tools are included in RHEL 6, and it works well.

The ones mentioned at present are:

 * Fibre Channel
 * iSCSI
 * NFS
 * GFS2

This should be updated to include SRP (SCSI RDMA Protocol), the block export protocol used in Infiniband and 10GbE iWARP adapters.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

The Kernel modules are in the main RHEL 6 kernel package. i.e. kernel-2.6.32-19.el6 for the beta.

The user space tools are in the RHEL 6 srp-tools package.  srptools-0.0.4-7.el6 for the beta.

Comment 1 Justin Clift 2010-05-01 14:33:08 UTC
Also found a missing mention of it here in Chapter 1 of the Virtualization Guide too:


The only ones mentioned there are:

 * files on local storage,
 * physical disk partitions,
 * locally connected physical LUNs,
 * LVM partitions,
 * iSCSI, and
 * Fibre Channel-based LUNs

Comment 2 Justin Clift 2010-05-01 15:05:28 UTC
It's probably worth adding mention of GNBD as a supported storage type too.

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2010-05-01 16:15:05 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for

Comment 5 Don Domingo 2010-05-04 00:16:02 UTC
thanks Justin. I am reassigning this to the Virtualization Guide's author for review.

Comment 6 Christopher Curran 2010-05-05 00:42:52 UTC
GNBD? If that is officially supported I'll add that too.

Added SRP.


Comment 7 Christopher Curran 2010-05-05 00:51:25 UTC
Fixed in build 15.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.