Bug 588281 – [abrt] crash in mono-core-2.4.3.1-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/mono was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bug 588281 - [abrt] crash in mono-core-2.4.3.1-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/mono was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in mono-core-2.4.3.1-1.fc12: Process /usr/bin/mono was killed by...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 570574

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	mono (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Xavier Lamien
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:dd9264147af0fc90108ad1dcf40...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-03 07:50 EDT by Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz
Modified:	2010-05-25 05:52 EDT (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:52:06 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (36.53 KB, text/plain) 2010-05-03 07:51 EDT, Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2010-05-03 07:50:50 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: mono /usr/lib64/gnome-do/Do.exe
component: mono
executable: /usr/bin/mono
global_uuid: dd9264147af0fc90108ad1dcf40e36db8e1eab4f
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: mono-core-2.4.3.1-1.fc12
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/bin/mono was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz 2010-05-03 07:51:03 EDT

Created attachment 410952 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:52:06 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 570574 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:52:06 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #570574.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.