Bug 589111 – [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Bug 589111 - [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed ...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 572734

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	nautilus (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tomáš Bžatek
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:0efdeafd878d6b074f17a462601...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-05 08:28 EDT by James
Modified:	2015-03-03 17:47 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:34:32 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (43.93 KB, text/plain) 2010-05-05 08:28 EDT, James	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description James 2010-05-05 08:28:18 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_file_peek_display_name
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: 0efdeafd878d6b074f17a4626012e52edecf87ec
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.28.4-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

Comment 1 James 2010-05-05 08:28:24 EDT

Created attachment 411572 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:34:32 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 572734 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:34:32 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #572734.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.