Bugzilla (bugzilla.redhat.com) will be under maintenance for infrastructure upgrades and will not be available on July 31st between 12:30 AM - 05:30 AM UTC. We appreciate your understanding and patience. You can follow status.redhat.com for details.
Bug 589182 - [abrt] crash in gnochm-0.9.11-4.fc12: pango_fc_fontset_get_font_at: Process /usr/bin/python was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in gnochm-0.9.11-4.fc12: pango_fc_fontset_get_font_at: Process /...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 558330
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnochm
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Haïkel Guémar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:aa0f81cbf274010f2b542f66f5a...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-05 15:27 UTC by dataeditama
Modified: 2010-05-24 15:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-24 15:07:12 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (54.63 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-05 15:27 UTC, dataeditama 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description dataeditama 2010-05-05 15:27:52 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/gnochm '/home/mada/Desktop/Red Hat Linux Fedora For Dummies (2004).chm'
component: gnochm
crash_function: pango_fc_fontset_get_font_at
executable: /usr/bin/python
global_uuid: aa0f81cbf274010f2b542f66f5a8bf0a33807c8d
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686.PAE
package: gnochm-0.9.11-4.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/python was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
Comment 1 dataeditama 2010-05-05 15:27:57 UTC 
Created attachment 411651 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-24 15:07:12 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 558330 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-24 15:07:12 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #558330.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.