Bug 589274 - [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12: _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait: Process /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12: _dbus_pthread_condvar_wa...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 538023
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution-data-server
Version: 12
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:5c0ee45e055357e1ca8b44c4c36...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-05 17:39 UTC by Carsten Diederichs
Modified: 2010-05-25 10:39 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 10:39:12 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (40.67 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-05 17:39 UTC, Carsten Diederichs 		no flags Details
View All

Description Carsten Diederichs 2010-05-05 17:39:42 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_DataServer_CalFactory:1.2 --oaf-ior-fd=24
component: evolution-data-server
crash_function: _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28
global_uuid: 5c0ee45e055357e1ca8b44c4c3673e76c8053b8d
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.i686
package: evolution-data-server-2.28.3-2.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution-data-server-2.28 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Omega 12.1 Fedora Remix release 12 (Omega 12.1 Fedora Remix)
Comment 1 Carsten Diederichs 2010-05-05 17:39:44 UTC 
Created attachment 411685 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:39:12 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 538023 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 10:39:12 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #538023.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.