Bug 589349 – [abrt] crash in yelp-2.28.1-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/yelp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Bug 589349 - [abrt] crash in yelp-2.28.1-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/yelp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)

Summary:	[abrt] crash in yelp-2.28.1-1.fc12: raise: Process /usr/bin/yelp was killed b...

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 541918

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	yelp (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	12
Hardware:	x86_64 Linux

Priority	low Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Matthew Barnes
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	abrt_hash:2938137d35a9951564f34f68ce0...
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-05-05 18:24 EDT by Kevin Baker
Modified:	2014-12-01 18:09 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-25 05:48:59 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (44.48 KB, text/plain) 2010-05-05 18:24 EDT, Kevin Baker	no flags	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Kevin Baker 2010-05-05 18:24:11 EDT

abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: gnome-help ghelp:///usr/share/gnome/help/gnome-terminal/C/gnome-terminal.xml
component: yelp
crash_function: raise
executable: /usr/bin/yelp
global_uuid: 2938137d35a9951564f34f68ce006400a5f00f88
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: yelp-2.28.1-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/yelp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
1. using gnome help and clicked a link
2.
3.

Comment 1 Kevin Baker 2010-05-05 18:24:13 EDT

Created attachment 411752 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:48:59 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 541918 ***

Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 05:48:59 EDT

This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #541918.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.